home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 94 15:14 BST-1
- From: Ofir Gal <ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Subject: Re: Proposal
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- Message-Id: <memo.262101@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- In-Reply-To: <H.ekK.DGvswKm1ppc@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>
-
-
- In message <H.ekK.DGvswKm1ppc@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>, mforget@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca said:
- >
- >How about Control (left), Shift (middle), ALT (right), letter (last)?
-
- It seems that most German programs use SHIFT+ALT+char or SHIFT+ALT+char
- which looks fine to me.
-
- >While I'm thinking about this, how can we ensure that the program that
- >changes keyboard shortcuts (by editing the resource strings) has enough
-
- We will have to discuss a protocol for this. For a start how would the
- program know if the application it's modifying supports this? A hidden
- object somewhere with some agreed text could be a solution. But before we
- start discussing this, let's finish with the keyboard shortcuts.
-
- Bye,
-
- Ofir ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk
-
-